TONTO RIDES AGAIN!
November 19, 2018
TONTO: The 50-Year Saga of the Synth Heard on Stevie Wonder Classics
Continue reading
Category
TONTO: The 50-Year Saga of the Synth Heard on Stevie Wonder Classics
Continue reading
Lori Burton tells her story — and writes another love song for her husband and soulmate Roy Cicala. The video (below) is from the fateful Arbors sessions that led to Roy leaving A&R and joining Record Plant. Roy Cicala and…
Continue reading
Michael Braunstein tells how life, love and labor all married together for the Record Plant family: There were quite a few romantic couples at the Record Plant over the years. And a few not so romantic, too. Scooter (Sharon…
Continue readingClive Davis was so impressed with a 1972 showcase performance of Aerosmith at Max’s Kansas City that he immediately signed the band to Columbia Records. But the very expensive, much-anticipated, self-titled 1973 debut album dropped with a quiet thud. …
Continue readingMalcolm Cecil remembers finding out that Chris Stone had rented out Studio B for a movie. (Note the beautiful John Storyk-designed cabinets that were designed to house Margouleff and Cecil’s TONTO) “We booked (Studio B) out but occasionally we weren’t…
Continue reading
Before his death, Mike Stone was a great friend of the Record Plant Diaries project. Here, in his own words, are some of his favorite memories about the early days at the Record Plant. From Day One We took possession…
Continue readingFrom from the interview transcript: Bill Szymczyk, “Hotel California” Eagles Producer/Engineer I was working at the Record Plant, and Joe Walsh was the one who said, “You’ve got to really talk to these guys (the Eagles).” I said, “I…
Continue reading
The Record Plant Diaries is built on the stories of the artists, engineers, producers, and “hangers-on” who worked and lived in the studios in New York, Los Angeles and Sausalito, as well as those who were part of the Record…
Continue reading
The House That Hendrix Built: Inside the Birth of the Record Plant
How the guitarist’s partnership with engineer Gary Kellgren gave rise to ‘Electric Ladyland’ – and one of rock’s most legendary studios
https://www.producertomwilson.com/musicfactory/MFRS-23.Engineers.mp3
#friendsofrecordplant
#recordplant
#producertomwilson
Bill Szymczyk and Joe Walsh: “Hotel California” | Record Plant Diaries
Birth of a Record: The Witnesses By Mr. Bonzai Bill Szymczyk and Joe Walsh: “Hotel California” Recorded at the Record Plant in Los Angeles and at Criteria Studios in Miami. Released in 1976, two G…
I have bee out of the hospital for eight days ,, Complete lung and heart failure
Prof , that City ,city council .. county including county DA and commissioners , state legislators are involved in human trafficking and much more
Edward M Johnston Has Filed in State of Oregon secretary office including this filed with the senate and house as you can see, Not one of the Elected and Public servants have disagree with the facts this public notice published for three weeks in the newspapers , public notice boards and museums please read
https://olis.leg.state.or.us/liz/2015R1/…
https://olis.leg.state.or.us/liz/2015R1/Downloads/CommitteeMeetingDocument/68438
U.C.C. 1- 241, 242, 306, 308/ U.C.C. 1-207 All Rights Reserve) WITH RESERVATION OF ALL RIGHTS WITHOUT PREJUDICE UCC 1 -308
:Given Name Edward Malone Johnston II. Non-corporation, Lawful American native Bloodline, thereof:
Non- State Register Cooperation
C\O NON -Cooperation ~1540 North Nye Street Oregon Territory Near Toledo
DMM 602@1.3(e)2 Zone Improvement Plan (ZIP CODE) not required.
Hiring Any Attorney waives Constitutional Protections, makes humans wards of court with unsound mind
https://govbanknotes.wordpress.com/2016/04/…
The Unauthorized Practice of Law
Fire your BAR Attorney. Refuse to acknowledge their corrupt inner-bar courts of thievery. Formally charge them with the illegal act of practicing law without lawful authority. Why? A BAR Attorney is not a lawyer by lawful definition. An Esquire is an officer of the State with the duty to carry out State activities, including "attornment."
State officers have no constitutional authority to practice law as lawyers, barristers, advocates, or solicitors. Americans should begin formally charging these false lawyers with unlawfully practicing the profession of law since their BAR licenses only give them the privilege to be Attorneys and Squires over land transfers. The Unauthorized Practice of Law
Fire your BAR Attorney. Refuse to acknowledge their corrupt inner-bar courts of thievery. Formally charge them with the illegal act of practicing law without lawful authority. Why? A BAR Attorney is not a lawyer by lawful definition. An Esquire is an officer of the State with the duty to carry out State activities, including "attornment."
State officers have no constitutional authority to practice law as lawyers, barristers, advocates, or solicitors. Americans should begin formally charging these false lawyers with unlawfully practicing the profession of law since their BAR licenses only give them the privilege to be Attorneys and Squires over land transfers.
The following is an example of a case law defining the term idiot:
‘An idiot is a person who has been from birth or infancy deficient in mental capacity, and destitute of the ordinary intellectual powers.’ [Sandefur v. Commonwealth, 143 Ky. 655 (Ky. 1911)]
Federal Judge Declares ‘Policing for Profit’ Unconstitutional
https://aclu.org/blog/criminal-law-reform/…
PEOPLE HAVE RIGHTS, PERSONS HAVE PRIVILEGES.
And that’s because once a MAN signs up for a privilege, he becomes a PERSON. Take health club membership for example. If you’re a member, you’re a PERSON subject to club rules. It’s the private CONTRACT that makes you a person. Without that contract, you have inalienable rights. In the contract, that contract over-rules those rights. I.e. you’ve become a PERSON with privileges and can’t call on the Public Law (Constitution) to defend yourself, since you’re in a PRIVATE contract.
Here are some such contracts: Birth Certificate, Residency status, and even engaging in COMMERCE makes you a person subject to State’s Public Policy (Statutes and codes).
Fw: police to contact lawful bloodline native Americans only when summon
Human-traffic , Human-trafficking
Elected and public servants when committing criminal activeness lawful bloodline native Americans need to file the criminal charges need to be filed on
Edward Johnston – Please call him Property Tax challenge… | Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/thedailyshow/posts/…oregonjohn…/676816585714203/
All my Records of my strawman account EDWARD MALONE JOHNSTON II being used …… John Kitzhaber, Oregon senator house member majority,Ted Ferrioli …
Edward Johnston – stop the lies to the children and mind… | Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/CowboyCorral/posts/stop…-/1461352940593893/
“Emails that former Gov. John Kitzhaber tried to have deleted reveal that he turned … Gov. Kate Brown, Gov. Kitzhaber, Oregon Secretary … and Ed Johnston, .
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=edjohnston+toledo+oregon
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=edjohnston+toledo+oregon
Lincoln County Oregon Sheriff, I don’t need an order or a warrant… ?
The Kidnapping and Held for ransom including Identity thrift
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4zBZd-NS-Cs
Ed’s unlawful kidnapping by Ruark’s camera part 1 kidnap held for ransom He Assaulted me
Ed’s unlawful kidnapping by Ruark’s camera part 1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3UrR7PTqIpc
Kidnap and held for ransom as well putting a loaded gun to me head
Ed’s Kidnapping 09/11/2013 by Toledo Police Department Corporation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEm5wkwJzEU
corporation attorney Bruce L McCrum and Ed states when cops murder is not murder its a homicide
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vTJy1JdRrsI
corporation attorney an only represent corporation only by federal and state laws in the affidavit provided
Oregon Sate attorney letter stated the police can harm anyone
Oregon Department of Justice: Attorney General
www.doj.state.or.us/
de
… of Attorney General Ellen F. Rosenblum, the Oregon Department of Justice serves state government … From the Office of Attorney General Ellen F. Rosenblum.
Ed Johnston’s unlawful arrest 2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N7Y-0dA19aU
Further harassment from City of Toledo Chief of Police David Enyeart
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HTXTZOI8Oqg
Toledo police kidnap held for ransom Ed Johnston’s Unlawful arrest the audio
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YrW5zw7laKI
Harassment on our way to City of Toledo Oregon Council Meeting Part 1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3Tqsn6FQ8E
Harassment on our way to City of Toledo Oregon Council Meeting Part 3
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1bTK80lK570
No Oath of official office stating they don’t need oath or insurance bond
Oaths – Lawless in Lincoln County Oregon May 30, 2014
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bFNjVX3iAFc
State Senator Arnie Roblan on the Rights to travel and Uninsured Motorist fund 05/13/2013
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4i_3XWfkZ2g
1st and 5th Amendment Violated at Toledo Oregon Council Meeting
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fbu0vRwpf_k
Thomas Branford October 24 2014 AD Lincoln County a mites he needs no oath
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bEMYv49bdZo
$75,000 Bail For The Kidnapping of Edward Johnston
Edward-Malone: Johnston vs. Corruption in Lincoln County Oregon
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eztKvlODgU0
Oaths – Lawless in Lincoln County Oregon May 30, 2014
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bFNjVX3iAFc
For filming me in court An Attempt to kill me in jail not one but twice
Chris Trial 15 November 6th 2014
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sDduaodtfQ
Lying say people need permission to tape criminal actions of the Clark and acting committing treason
Thomas Branford in Lincoln County Circuit Court October 16 2014 AD
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MGU8yX5FFX8
Johnston v. City of Toledo et al :: Justia Dockets & Filings
dockets.justia.com › … › Oregon › Oregon District Court
Defendant: City of Toledo, Pete Wall, Sharon Branstitter, … Access this case on the Oregon District Court’s Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System.
Edward Johnston – Please call him John kitzharber…. | Facebook
www.facebook.com/barniesandlers/posts/…
Edward Johnston … EDWARD MALONE JOHNSTON II. … John Kitzhaber, Oregon senator house member majority,Ted Ferrioli – certified mail# 7012-2210-0002-3843-5578 …
Edward Johnston – Hi john,,lets say you are real call …
www.facebook.com/johnakitzhaber/posts/…
John A. Kitzhaber September 22 at 9:20 AM Guiding the Asteroid Sixty-six million years ago an asteroid hit ea … rth, bringing about the extinction of the dinosaurs, and wiping out roughly seventy-five percent of life on the planet.
Humantrafficking
state oregon senate bill 499 1999
Bruce L McCrum and Ed
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vTJy1JdRrsI&t=2s
Why I was Kidnap and held for ransom
Ed Johnston Running for Sheriff 06/05/2013
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6tVMlqBuMdc
above conversation
Ed’s unlawful kidnapping Harpster’s recording Part 2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JomrQe3p5vk
Further harassment from City of Toledo Chief of Police David Enyeart
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HTXTZOI8Oqg&t=17s
1st and 5th Amendment Violated at Toledo Oregon Council Meeting
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fbu0vRwpf_k&t=90s
Subservient Court in Lincoln County Oregon under the STATE OF OREGON legislators.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tjxg_h9v4mc&t=137s
Lincoln County Judge has no Oath Chris Unlawful Hearing 10-28-201
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RscVVZmOQug
Who are you?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XijQHR-ZWss
Rob Bovett ,,he Rob Wonted great harm to Edward Keep me in jail t I had a heart attack on file
Edward Johnston – thank you ,Austin Thomas , Liberty Lisa …
www.facebook.com/itmattershowyoustand/posts/…
June 6, 2013 ·,, Rob Bovett former Lincoln county da,, GUERRILLA RADIO and Lisa Brumfiel aka Liberty Lisa and I would like to thank to Laura Weaver and Ken Ball for updating us on the harrasment and unconstitutional arrest of Edward Johnston in Lincoln Oregon…also mad props to Randy Due for laying out the UNIFORM BONDING CODE and …
GUERRILLA RADIO and Lisa Brumfiel aka Liberty Lisa and I would like to thank to Laura Weaver and Ken Ball for updating us on the harrasment and unconstitutional arrest of Edward Johnston in Lincoln Oregon…also mad props to Randy Due for laying out the UNIFORM BONDING CODE and CONSTITUTION….an awesome show !!!!
Guerrilla Radio
Join our live chat and listen To A ground-breaking, unique internet radio station. Anything and Everything against the New World order FreedomizerRadio.com Call in and join us – 347.324.3704 Guerrilla Radio This show uses guerilla reporting…
blogtalkradio.com
http://blogtalkradio.com/freedomizerradio/2013/…
Where do these mindless trolls come from, anyway?
They seem to be saturating the Internet with painfully obvious nonsense.
FYI: many YEARS of concentrated work went into this pleading:
http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/civil/iccpr/
Further reading:
http://supremelaw.org/authors/buergenthal/
(+ private email sent to Judge Buergenthal re: Petition Clause)
http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/seibert-fohr/seibert_fohr_5.pdf
http://supremelaw.org/authors/goodman/GoodmanHuman_RightsTreaties_Invalid_Reservations.pdf
http://supremelaw.org/authors/goodman/HR.Treaties.Invalid.Reservations.and.State.Consent.png
http://supremelaw.org/authors/carter/Judicial.Power.to.Compel.Domestic.Treaty.Implementation.pdf
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, Civil RICO: 18 U.S.C. 1964;
Agent of the United States as Qui Tam Relator (4X),
Federal Civil False Claims Act: 31 U.S.C. 3729 et seq.
http://supremelaw.org/support.guidel
The Unauthorized Practice of Law
Fire your BAR Attorney. Refuse to acknowledge their corrupt inner-bar courts of thievery. Formally charge them with the illegal act of practicing law without lawful authority. Why? A BAR Attorney is not a lawyer by lawful definition. An Esquire is an officer of the State with the duty to carry out State activities, including "attornment."
State officers have no constitutional authority to practice law as lawyers, barristers, advocates, or solicitors. Americans should begin formally charging these false lawyers with unlawfully practicing the profession of law since their BAR licenses only give them the privilege to be Attorneys and Squires over land transfers.
Fire your BAR Attorney. Refuse to acknowledge their corrupt inner-bar courts of thievery. Formally charge them with the illegal act of practicing law without lawful authority. Why? A BAR Attorney is not a lawyer by lawful definition. An Esquire is an officer of the State with the duty to carry out State activities, including "attornment."
State officers have no constitutional authority to practice law as lawyers, barristers, advocates, or solicitors. Americans should begin formally charging these false lawyers with unlawfully practicing the profession of law since their BAR licenses only give them the privilege to be Attorneys and Squires over land transfers. The Unauthorized Practice of Law
Personal property nothing more then a property someone else own it, and your boss man let you use it…. private is a property you own it out right….
From Black’s Law Dictionary 6th edition:
ALLODIAL – “Free; not beholden of any lord or superior; owned without obligation…; the opposite of feudal.” Barker v. Dayton 28 Wis. 384; Wallace v. Harmstad, 44 Pa. 499.
ALLODIUM – “Land held absolutely in one’s own right, and not of any lord or superior; land not subject to feudal duties or burdens (property taxes and municipal codes). An estate held by absolute ownership without recognizing any superior to whom any duty is due on account thereof.” 1 Wash, Real Property 16., 9 Cow. (N.Y.) 511, 18 Am. Dec. 516.
“No more can private property be so taken away by judicial decision and handed over, gratis, to the State. ‘The touchstone of due process is the protection of the individual against arbitrary action of the government.’” Hughes v. Washington, 389 U.S. 290, 294-298 (1967); California ex rel. State Lands Commission v. United States, No. 89 Original (June 18, 1982); Waterman v. Smith, 13 Cal. 373 (1859); Chipley v. Farris, 45 Cal. 527 (1873); Cassidy v. Carr, 48 Cal. 339 (1874); Los Angeles Farming & Milling Co. v. Thompson, 117 Cal. 594, 49 P. 714 (1897), aff’d sub nom. Thompson v. Los Angeles Farming & Milling Co., 180 U.S. 71 (1901); Leese v. Clark, 18 Cal. 535 (1861); A patent is the highest evidence of title, and is conclusive as against the Government, and all claiming under junior patents or titles until it is set aside or annulled by some judicial tribunal in a direct proceeding for that purpose. Moore v. Robins, 96 U.S. 533. Co. v. Henby (1912), 178 Ind. 239, 248, 97 N.E. 313.
"The Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956. It took several years of wrangling, but a new Federal-Aid Highway Act passed in June 1956. The law authorized the construction of a 41,000-mile network of interstate highways that would span the nation. It also allocated $26 billion to pay for them. May 27, 2010".
In the first sentence its mentioned as an "ACT". In the next sentence, it is mistakenly referred to as a "LAW". Even Supreme Court justice "decisions and opinions" are referred to as "CASE LAW" once copywrited by the foreign BAR attorneys. No wonder State and municipal CODE/ACT Enforcement OFFICERS don’t know what end is up.
The entire commercial system operates in FRAUD and fraud of necessity due to the current Chapter eleven reorganization bankruptcy of the United States federal corporation.
Edward Johnston – Facebook
www.facebook.com/woodyharrelson/posts/…
Rob Bovett, Lincoln County’s top prosecutor, said Tuesday he is resigning his post to take a position with the Association of Oregon Counties. … Edward Johnston …
Kidnap And held for ransom for Video tapering Edward Johnston
Edward-Malone: Johnston vs. Corruption in Lincoln County Oregon
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eztKvlODgU0
1 Corruption in Lincoln County Oregon Against Christopher-Robert: Walker https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VV-uQVqSMqE
2 Lincoln County Oregon Corruption against Christopher-Robert: Walker
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tXI3pLY0gI
Walker court Fraud be the DA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RscVVZmOQug
Oaths – Lawless in Lincoln County Oregon May 30, 2014
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bFNjVX3iAFc&t=58s
Toledo Oregon alleged Municipal Court False court
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mi4xrodPraA
Thomas Branford October 24 2014 AD Lincoln County Oregon
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bEMYv49bdZo&t=106s
Acting Judge to put me in-jail to seriously harm me
Subservient Court in Lincoln County Oregon under the STATE OF OREGON legislators.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tjxg_h9v4mc
Federal Judge Declares ‘Policing for Profit’ Unconstitutional
https://aclu.org/blog/criminal-law-reform/…
Crosswalk Sting, Toledo Oregon 2017
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAVWs8PkiZA
[PDF]Edward Johnston testimony – Oregon Legislative Information System
https://olis.leg.state.or.us/liz/2015R1/Downloads/CommitteeMeetingDocument/68438
Nov 14, 2014 – SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES *** … Disclaimer. a man, edward-malone johnston , non-corporate entity reserve the right to amend or make further …. contract laws by said law of allocation of said education funds. 99 …… Oregon territory [97391-9998] Phone: 541 336 1233. NOTICE OF SERVICE: 499.
https://olis.leg.state.or.us/liz/2015R1/Downloads/CommitteeMeetingDocument/68438
COSTS AND FEES:
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that a natural individual entitled to relief is entitled to free access to its judicial tribunals and public offices in every State in the Union (2 Black 620, see also Crandell v. Nevada, 6 Wall 35. Plaintiff should not be charged fees, or costs for the lawful and constitutional right to petition this court in this matter in which he is entitled to relief, as it appears that the filing fee rule was originally implemented for fictions and subjects of the State and should not be applied to the Plaintiff who is a natural individual and entitled to relief. Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43]
VEHICLE CODE – VEH
DIVISION 1. WORDS AND PHRASES DEFINED [100 – 681] ( Division 1 enacted by Stats. 1959, Ch. 3. )
260.
(a) A “commercial vehicle” is a motor vehicle of a type required to be registered under this code used or maintained for the transportation of persons for hire, compensation, or profit or designed, used, or maintained primarily for the transportation of property.
(b) Passenger vehicles and house cars that are not used for the transportation of persons for hire, compensation, or profit are not commercial vehicles. This subdivision shall not apply to Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 6700) of Division 3.
(c) Any vanpool vehicle is not a commercial vehicle.
http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml/…
"For a crime to exist, there must be an injured party. There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of this exercise of Constitutional rights."- Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F. 945.
AT LAW. "This phrase is used to point out that a thing is to be done according to the course of the common law; it is distinguished from a proceeding in equity."
"All laws, rules and practices which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void" [Marbury v. Madison, 5th US (2 Cranch) 137, 180]
The common law is the real law, the Supreme Law of the land, the code, rules, regulations, policy and statutes are “not the law”, [Self v. Rhay, 61 Wn (2d) 261]
"The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void and ineffective for any purpose, since its unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment… In legal contemplation, it is as inoperative as if it had never been passed… Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no right, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection and justifies no acts performed under it… A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing law. Indeed insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, (the Constitution) it is superseded thereby. No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it." [Bonnett v. Vallier, 116 N.W. 885, 136 Wis. 193 (1908); NORTON v. SHELBY COUNTY, 118 U.S. 425 (1886)]
District attorneys or hear say witnesses No injured Woman man or Children no Crime Corpis DelitiDistrict attorneys or hear say witnesses No injured Woman man or Children no Crime Corpis Deliti
Where is the Corpus Delicti? It would appear the above are Crime Victims, Corpus Delicti themselves in all matters related thereof. This supposed tax would therefore have to comply to the Lawful Definition of “income” for all tax legislation as defined by the UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT: Straton’s Indep. V Howbert 231 U.S. 339 (1913) “the gain derived from Capital, from labor or from both combined, provided it include the sale or conversion of a capital asset“; the result of corporate activity. Exactly what corporate activity are these dead entities engaged in that they would be required to file a Corporate return? Show me the Corpus Delicti thereof. The Birth Record fraud scheme deliberately established by the legal community, members of Congress, Federal Reserve, the PRESIDENT AND CEO of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, dba, A FEDERAL CORPORATION, JUDGES, LAWYERS and ATTORNEYS, Courts, Clerks of the Court, present and past, to steal these RULE 4-5.5 UNLICENSED PRACTICE OF LAW; MULTIJURISDICTIONAL PRACTICE OF LAW
"Statements of counsel in brief or in argument are not facts before the court and are therefore insufficient for a motion to dismiss or for summary judgment." Trinsey v Pagliaro, D.C.Pa. 1964, 229 F.Supp. 647.; Jones Vs General Elec. Co., 87 F.3d 209,211 (7th Cir. 1996).
"Statements of counsel in brief or in argument are not facts before the court and are therefore insufficient for a motion to dismiss or for summary judgment." Trinsey v Pagliaro, D.C.Pa. 1964, 229 F.Supp. 647.; Jones Vs General Elec. Co., 87 F.3d 209,211 (7th Cir. 1996).
Pro Per and pro se litigants should therefore always remember that the majority of the time, the motion to dismiss a case is only argued by the opposing attorney, who is not allowed to testify on the facts of the case, the motion to dismiss is never argued by the real party in interest.
Statutes forbidding administering of oath by attorney’s in cases in which they may be engaged applies to affidavits as well. Deyo v. Detroit Creamery Co (Mich 1932) 241 N.W.2d 244.
The practice of an attorney filing an affidavit on behalf of his client asserting the status of that client is not approved, in as much as not only does the affidavit become hearsay, but it places the attorney in a position of witness thus compromising his role as advocate. Porter v. Porter, (N.D. 1979 ) 274 N.W.2d 235 ñ.
"The prosecutor is not a witness; and he should not be permitted to add to the record either by subtle or gross improprieties. Those who have experienced the full thrust of the power of government when leveled against them know that the only protection the citizen has is in the requirement for a fair trial." Donnelly v. Dechristoforo, 1974.SCT.41709 ¶ 56; 416 U.S. 637 (1974) Mr. Justice Douglas, dissenting.
“The right to privacy includes an “individual interest in avoiding disclosure of personal matters.” Whalen v. Roe, 429 US 589 (1977).
"Under no possible view, however, of the findings we are considering can they be held to constitute a compliance with the statute, since they merely embody conflicting statements of counsel concerning the facts as they suppose them to be and their appreciation of the law which they deem applicable, there being, therefore, no attempt whatever to state the ultimate facts by a consideration of which we would be able to conclude whether or not the judgment was warranted." Gonzales v. Buist. (04/01/12) 224 U.S. 126, 56 L. Ed. 693, 32 S. Ct. 463.
"Where there are no depositions, admissions, or affidavits the court has no facts to rely on for a summary determination." Trinsey v. Pagliaro, D.C. Pa. 1964, 229 F. Supp. 647.
Title 42 § 408(a)(8) Title 42 § 408
(a) In general Whoever –
(8) discloses, uses, or compels the disclosure of the social security number of any person in violation of the laws of the United States; shall be guilty of a felony and upon conviction thereof shall be fined under title 18 or imprisoned for not more than five years, or both.Title 42 § 408(a)(8)
All government officials and agencies, including all State legislatures, are bound by the Constitution and Shall NOT create any defacto 1871 Act, 1933 banking act laws which counter the Constitution: The U.S. Supreme Court, in 1895, ruled unconstitutional a federal law… containing unlawful income taxes, senate and house Bills ones birth certificate , statutes and codes with arguments concerning class warfare and the definition of a direct tax. "Herein…Ohio’s Doctrine of Governmental Immunity was held unconstitutional and others to numerous to mention." (Civil Rights) (Krause vs Ohio, app 2d 1 L.N.W. 2d 321 1971.) Reich vs State Highway Dept. 336, Mich 617: 194 N.W. 2d 700 197"Employees of a city or state are not immune from suit under statute relating civil rights for deprivations of rights on ground that officials were acting within the scope of their ground that officials were acting within the Scope of their responsibilities of performing a discretionary act." (Bunch vs Barnett 376 F.Sup. 23.)"Title 28 Section 1391, this section makes it possible to bring actions against government officials and agencies in district court outside D.C." (Civil Rights) (Norton vs Mcshane 14 L.Ed. 2d 274.)A suit in detinue or replevin in personam should lie to gain possession of property seized by the state. (Civil Rights) Stephen, Pleading (3rd Am ed) p. 47, 52, 69, 74; Ames Lectures on legal history, p. 64, 71; Wilkins v. Despard, 5 Term Rep- 112; Roberts v. Withered, % Mod. 193, 12 Mod. 92.
Public Officer Occupies a Fiduciary Relationship to the Political Entity; 63C Am. Jur.2d, Public Officers and Employees, Section 247 “As expressed otherwise, the powers delegated to a public officer are held in trust for the people and are to be exercised in behalf of the government or of all American citizens who may need the intervention of the officer. [1]Furthermore, the view has been expressed that all public officers, within whatever branch and whatever the political entity on whose behalf he or she serves. [2] That is, a public officer occupies a fiduciary relationship to level of government and whatever be their private vocations, are trustees of the people, and accordingly labor under every disability and prohibition imposed by law upon trustees relative to the making of personal financial gain from a discharge of their trusts. [3] And owes a fiduciary duty to the public, as American citizens. [4] It has been said that the fiduciary responsibilities of a public officer cannot be less than those of a private individual, Meaning, no less than the American citizens. [5] Furthermore, it has been stated that any enterprise undertaken by the public official who tends to weaken public confidence and undermine the sense of security for individual rights is against public policy. Fraud in its elementary common law sense of deceit-and this is one of the meanings that fraud bears [483 U.S. 372] in the statute. See United States v. Dial, 757 F.2d, 163, 168 (7th Cir1985) includes the deliberate concealment of material information in a setting of fiduciary obligation. A public official is a fiduciary tow. This is true The Conspiracy and attempts on my life liberty and pursuit of happiness That Destroy the only opportunity that I had Being a Disabled man ruin for capital gains of the devil’s contractors as I call it to date, As my Inheritance has not been release to me Because I refused too Sign my rights over as I have been threaten for many years nows as on public recored I will not sign my God Give Right over to any Devil Contractors over to you are my parents As my Parents and this Elected and public servants agency are constituently threating my life liberty and the purist of happiness in violation of my civil right That The Creator Gave me By God to live free and to past down to the next Generation of Lawful Tax free Sovereign Americans.
Article 1, section 9 of 1776 Constitution : No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.
SUPREME COURT RULING: Police Have No Duty To Protect The General Public http://gunssavelives.net/…/supreme-court-ruling-police…/
Federal Law also prohibits Cities and Counties from issuing citations against businesses, see Title 18 U.S.C.891-896, quoting Section 891 "An extortionate means is any means which involves the use, or an express or implicit threat of use, of violence or other criminal means to cause harm to the person, reputation, or property."
No one Is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce
Federal Law also prohibits Cities and Counties from issuing citations against businesses, see Title 18 U.S.C.891-896, quoting Section 891 "An extortionate means is any means which involves the use, or an express or implicit threat of use, of violence or other criminal means to cause harm to the person, reputation, or property."
No one Is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce them
Federal Law also prohibits Cities and Counties from issuing citations against businesses, see Title 18 U.S.C.891-896, quoting Section 891 "An extortionate means is any means which involves the use, or an express or implicit threat of use, of violence or other criminal means to cause harm to the person, reputation, or property."
No one Is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce
"Personal liberty, or the Right to enjoyment of life and liberty, is one of the fundamental or natural Rights, which has been protected by its inclusion as a guarantee in the various constitutions, which is not derived from, or dependent on, the U.S. Constitution, which may not be submitted to a vote and may not depend on the outcome of an election. It is one of the most sacred and valuable Rights, as sacred as the Right to private property…and is regarded as UNALIENABLE." 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, Sect.202, p.987. It is not the duty of the police to protect you. Their job is to protect the Corporation and arrest code breakers.” (Sapp v. Tallahasee, 348 So. 2nd. 363, Reiff v. City of Philadelphia 477 F.Supp. 1262, Lynch v. N.C. Dept of Justice 376 S. E. 2nd. 247.) Palazzolo v. Rhode Island | The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent … www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2000/2000_99_2047
People rights’s vs Citizens’ and Elected and public servants rights, REPUBLIC VS DEMOCRACY (Art. 4, Sec. 4). In the Pledge of Allegiance we all pledged allegiance to our Republic, not a democracy. We are not that Republic! And I, want my Republic back!!!!! If you do not follow the Republic, you cannot join our Nation of the United States. That’s Treason. Because No other Nation can join our Nation, unless they are a Republic Nation. Now how stupid do you think you look, knowing they know that???
Section. 10. No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Manqué and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.
Sheriff No authority to arrest anyone.. Case No. S12C05018 THG they are the court room only
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
IN AND FOR SUSSEX COUNTY
http://nebula.wsimg.com/1e008a4b773b420285b7ebb7d117240e/…
A must Watch ASP https://www.facebook.com/lauryn.gray.100/videos/983400815179654/ Watch Now
Edward M Johnston Has Filed in State of Oregon secretary office including this filed with the senate and house . public Notice,, filed in news media as you can see, Not one of the Elected and Public servants have disagree with the facts this public notice published for three weeks in the newspapers , public notice boards and museums please read https://olis.leg.state.or.us/liz/2015R1/Downloads/CommitteeMeetingDocument/72439
olis.leg.state.or.us
https://olis.leg.state.or.us/liz/2015R1/… ,,, https://olis.leg.state.or.us/liz/2015R1/Downloads/CommitteeMeetingDocument/72439
2018 Saturday 5pm ..,, Sunday 5pm Education Knowledge public v private v Home schooling , .. Talking about lawful and legal money v house resolution 192 get it yet http://new.oregontrackers.com/home.html call 641 715 0864 pc 995745 file you rights is on Every Saturday and Sunday Read the information below could educate and aid yourself ,Saturday The Disclaimers talk show by edward johnston conversation Constitution lawful bloodline Republican form of Government V Legal British religious mind control Democracy REPORT 5pm oregon time 7pm central 8m East Cost
presented to you by http://new.oregontrackers.com/
THE LEGAL NAME IS "ID THEFT" BY LAWYERS/JUDGES
by UNDISCLOSED CONVERSION by use of PATENTS.
***thus – any Elected SHERIFF in this country serving "papers" for Foreclosures is committing TREASON.
– any unelected Police revenue agent in this country serving "papers" for Foreclosures is a Domestic Terrorist.
ITS THAT SIMPLE, FOLKS.
THIS IS WHY WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS
– and why an Executive Order needs to be issued as a MILITARY INJUNCTION on all THEATERS impersonating government buildings. Trafficking of IP’s via SSA Securities.
Dictionary of Law 1893 Christianity. The system of doctrines and precepts taught by Christ; the religion founded by Christ. Christianity is said to be part of the common law. "Christianity is parcel of the laws of England; and, therefore, to reproach the Christian religion is to speak in subversion of the law." -Taylor’s Case, Ventris 293 (1676). "The essential principles of natural religion and of revealed religion are a part of the common law, so that any person reviling or subverting or ridiculing them may be prosecuted at common law". -Case of Evans, 2 Burn. Ec. L. 185 (1780). The maxim can have no reference to the law of the National government, since the sources of that law are the Constitution, treaties, and acts of Congress. See Wheaton v. Peters, 8 Pet. 591 (1831). See further Law, Common; Blasphemy; Policy, 2.; Religion
WHEN JUDGE ASKS "WHAT’S YOUR NAME"?
If you’re in a PRIVATE/administrative court or court in a federal region such as CA, FL, TX, etc. then giving your name will be considered as a name of a STATUTORY PERSON, consisting of a FIRST and LAST name.
BUT if you’re on the land of the Republic or in a Public court of a Republic, then giving your name MUST be considered as name of a MAN, with a GIVEN and FAMILY name, who is protected by a Public/common law.
Agents of foreign principals
Any agent of a person described in section 611(b)(2) of this title or an entity described in section 611(b)(3) of this title if the agent has engaged in lobbying activities and has registered under the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 [2 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.] in connection with the agent’s representation of such person or entity.
(June 8, 1938, ch. 327, § 3, 52 Stat. 632; Aug. 7, 1939, ch. 521, § 2, 53 Stat. 1245; Apr. 29, 1942, ch. 263, § 1, 56 Stat. 254; Pub. L. 87–366, § 2, Oct. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 784; Pub. L. 89–486, § 3, July 4, 1966, 80 Stat. 246; Pub. L. 104–65, § 9(2), (3), Dec. 19, 1995, 109 Stat. 700; Pub. L. 105–166, § 5, Apr. 6, 1998, 112 Stat. 39.) All "public servants," officials, Congressmen, politicians, judges, attorneys, law enforcement officers, States and their various agencies, etc., are the express agents of these foreign principals – see Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938; 22 USC 286 et seq, 263A, 185G, 267J, 611(C) (ii) & (iii); Treasury Delegation Order #91 information how to file and education Whereas : " Failure to file the " Foreign Agents Registration Statement " goes directly to the jurisdiction and lack of standing to be before the Court and is a FELONY" pursuant to 18 US 219, 951 -" Failure to file the " Foreign Agents Registration Statement " goes directly to the jurisdiction
and lack of standing to be before the Court and is a FELONY" pursuant to 18 US 219, 951 –
A "public official” has no rights in relation to their employer, the city , state or federal government:
“The restrictions that the Constitution places upon the government in its capacity as lawmaker, i.e., as the regulator of private conduct, are not the same as the restrictions that it places upon the government in its capacity as employer. We have recognized this in many contexts, with respect to many different constitutional guarantees. Private citizens perhaps cannot be prevented from wearing long hair, but policemen can. Kelley v. Johnson, 425 U.S. 238, 247 (1976). Private Citizens cannot have their property searched without probable cause, but in many circumstances government employees can. O’Connor v. Ortega, 480 U.S. 709, 723 (1987) (plurality opinion); id., at 732 (SCALIA, J., concurring in judgment). Private citizens cannot be punished for refusing to provide the government information that may incriminate them, but government employees can be dismissed when the incriminating information that they refuse to provide relates to the performance of their job. Gardner v. Broderick, [497 U.S. 62, 95] 392 U.S. 273, 277 -278 (1968). With regard to freedom of speech in particular: Private Citizens cannot be punished for speech of merely private concern, but government employees can be fired for that reason. Connick v. Myers, 461 U.S. 138, 147 (1983). Private Citizens cannot be punished for partisan political activity, but federal and state employees can be dismissed and otherwise punished for that reason. Public Workers v. Mitchell, 330 U.S. 75, 101 (1947); Civil Service Comm’n v. Letter Carriers, 413 U.S. 548, 556 (1973); Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 616 -617 (1973).” [Rutan v. Republican Party of Illinois, 497 U.S. 62 (1990)]
2938.10 Proof of territorial jurisdiction.
The state or municipality in all cases must prove the offense committed within the territorial jurisdiction of the court, and in ordinance cases within the municipality, except as to those offenses in which the court has county wide jurisdiction created by statute and as to those cases in which certification has been made pursuant to section 2937.08 of the Revised Code.
Statutes and codes are not lawful.
Effective Date: 01-01-1960
The war between" United States Constitution" and the "Articles of Confederation".
You have the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution that are at war with each other.
You are a part of the "Articles of Confederation" as you are a free inhabitant, but the courts or judges try to t ie you to their system by your social security card and drivers license, where your name is in capital letters to show you are a citizen.
Admiralty Law: tries to trick people into their system by having the person say they are a citizen.
a.) Admiralty Laws and the courts are committing TREASON because they are outside the Territorial Jurisdiction (which is Federal Property).
JUDGE: Article 1111 of the Constitution says : a Judge has to hold court on property owned by the United States of America (Federal Property).
a.) If the judge is not practicing law on Federal property he/she is committing TREASON to the Constitution .
1.) The crime must be committed on Federal property owned by the "United States" (Washington D.C.)
2.) JUDGE: Have an oath, and is committing TREASON against the Constitution .
PROSECUTOR: is not practicing law on Federal property he/she is committing TREASON.
ATTORNEYS: Practicing law on property owned by the United States (Washington D.C.) are crooks and are impersonating a Federal Officer and committing FRAUD.
Commissioner: Are committing TREASON as they are not following the Constitution.
VOTING: If you think your vote counts, show me in the Constitution where it says you can do this. a.) Look up the word appointed, and see what it says. There are three in the constitution. b.) Look up Republic.
c. ) Where in the constitution does it say Democrat or Republican?
More Education Information on Lawful Bloodline Native American http://new.oregontrackers.com
“The restrictions that the Constitution places upon the government in its capacity as lawmaker, i.e., as the regulator of private conduct, are not the same as the restrictions that it places upon the government in its capacity as employer. We have recognized this in many contexts, with respect to many different constitutional guarantees. Private citizens perhaps cannot be prevented from wearing long hair, but policemen can. Kelley v. Johnson, 425 U.S. 238, 247 (1976). Private Citizens cannot have their property searched without probable cause, but in many circumstances government employees can. O’Connor v. Ortega, 480 U.S. 709, 723 (1987) (plurality opinion); id., at 732 (SCALIA, J., concurring in judgment). Private citizens cannot be punished for refusing to provide the government information that may incriminate them, but government employees can be dismissed when the incriminating information that they refuse to provide relates to the performance of their job. Gardner v. Broderick, [497 U.S. 62, 95] 392 U.S. 273, 277 -278 (1968). With regard to freedom of speech in particular: Private Citizens cannot be punished for speech of merely private concern, but government employees can be fired for that reason. Connick v. Myers, 461 U.S. 138, 147 (1983). Private Citizens cannot be punished for partisan political activity, but federal and state employees can be dismissed and otherwise punished for that reason. Public Workers v. Mitchell, 330 U.S. 75, 101 (1947); Civil Service Comm’n v. Letter Carriers, 413 U.S. 548, 556 (1973); Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 616 -617 (1973).” [Rutan v. Republican Party of Illinois, 497 U.S. 62 (1990)]
Hiring Any Attorney waives Constitutional Protections, makes humans wards of court with unsound mind
WHY YOU DON’T WANT AN ATTORNEY
That is a question that each must answer for themselves. However, before making that decision, you might wish to consider the following questions and answers:
https://govbanknotes.wordpress.com/2016/04/…
Your Constitution rights
Under U.S. Code, the president does have the statutory authority to keep anyone out of the country, for any reason he thinks best. Per 8 USC §1182
“Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.”
Yes, the president has the authority to do exactly what trump is describing. And by the way, this kind of thing has happened before.
HUMAN CAPITAL, William J. Clinton: "Executive Order 13037— March 3, 1997 (b) The appropriate definition of capital for Federal budgeting, including: use of capital for the Federal Government itself or the economy at large; ownership by the Federal Government or some other entity; defense and nondefense capital; physical capital and intangible or human capital; distinctions among investments in and for current, future, and retired workers; distinctions between capital to increase productivity and capital to enhance the quality of life; and existing definitions of capital for budgeting;
Has already been done..
Immigration Act of 1917 – Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1917
The Immigration Act of 1917 (also known as the Literacy Act and less often as the Asiatic Barred Zone Act) was the most sweeping immigration act the United States had passed until that time. It was the first bill aimed at restricting (as opposed to regulating) immigrants, and marked a turn toward nativism .
Immigration Act of 1917 » Immigration to the United States
immigrationtounitedstates.org › Asian immigrants
The Immigration Act of 1917 updated and codified much of the previous immigration legislation, thereby effectively repealing the Immigration Acts of 1903, 1907, and 1910. President Wilson vetoed the law, but Congress overrode his veto and the act went into effect on May 1, 1917.
Immigration Act of 1917 – University of Washington Bothell
>>> Penhallow v. Doane’s Administraters (3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed. 57; 3 Dall. 54),
SUPREME COURT RULING –
NO CORPORATE JURISDICTION OVER THE NATURAL MAN
Supreme Court of the United States 1795, “Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with other artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them.” S.C.R. 1795, (3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed. 57; 3 Dall. 54),
“For every thousand men who hack at the branches of evil, there is only one who is striking at the root.” Henry David Thoreau
PUBLIC NOTICE …PRIVATE: This is Not A Public Communication! This email is considered a transactional or relationship message, which is specifically excluded from the federal
law regulating email communication. Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent / Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal This private email message, and any attachment(s) is covered
by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2521, and is for the sole use of the intended recipient and contains privileged and/or confidential information. To all
public servants, including but not limited to Federal, State, or Local corporate government(s): I accept your oath of office as your firm and binding contract between you and me, one of
the People, whereby you have promised to serve, protect, and defend me, guarantee all of my inalienable rights, and defend the Constitution for the united States of America. Any/all
political, private, or public entities, International, Federal, State, or Local corporate government(s), private International Organization(s), Municipality(ies), Corporate agent(s), informant(s),
investigator(s) et. al., and/or third party(ies) working in collusion by monitoring My (this email) email(s), and any other means of communication without My express written permission are
barred from any review, use, disclosure, or distribution. With explicit reservation of all My rights, without prejudice and without recourse to any of My rights. Any omission does not constitute
a waiver of any and/or all intellectual property rights or reserved rights.
http://new.oregontrackers.com/
U.S. Code: Title 28 – JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE | US ..
www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28
15. 141. 16. 140, 296. 17. 291, 292, 295, 296 … Title 28 as Continuation of Existing Law; Change of Name of Circuit Courts of Appeals … capacity under the …
28 U.S. Code § 1332 – Diversity of citizenship; amount in …
www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/1332
This section is intended to cover all diversity of citizenship instances in civil actions in accordance with the judicial construction of the language in the original section 41(1) of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed. Therefore, the revised language covers civil actions between—
United States v. United States of America – Supreme Law
supremelaw.org/letters/us-v-usa.htm
Congress has conferred legal standing on the "United States" to sue and be sued at 28 U.S.C … and never has been, … define “United States” at. section 3002 is …
Public Health Law Article 30 – New York State Department of …
www.health.ny.gov › Policies, Laws and Regulations
Public Health Law Article 30. … * NB Effective March 28, 2017. Section 3000-D. Availability of Resuscitation Equipment in Certain Public Places. … Section 3002-A …
The Mississippi Constitution of 1890 as originally adopted
mshistorynow.mdah.state.ms.us/articles/103/index.php?s=…
Nothing in this section contained shall affect the right of any such corporation, municipality or county to make such subscription where the same has been authorized under laws existing at the time of the adoption of this constitution, and by a vote of the people thereof, had prior to its adoption, and where the terms of submission and …
Relevance of Criminal Conduct and Security Clearances …
news.clearancejobs.com/2011/01/26/relevance-of…
Relevance of Criminal Conduct and Security Clearances. … or who have been involved in previously unreported crime can also be affected. … Section 3002), …
Section 801 – Justice
www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov › … › Title 21 USC Codified CSA
SUBCHAPTER I — CONTROL AND ENFORCEMENT Part A — Introductory Provisions §801. Congressional findings and declarations: controlled substances
Uniform Code of Military Justice – UCMJ
www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/ucmj.htm
Is ‘Indians not taxed’ still a valid concept in U.S. law? – Quora
www.quora.com/Is-Indians-not-taxed-still-a-valid-concept-in…
Oct 6, 2016 … “American Indians do not pay taxes on moneys earned from their land allotments, since those lease fees are from the government and were …
Indians not taxed | The Legal Genealogist
www.legalgenealogist.com/2015/03/13/9643/
Mar 13, 2015 … Excluding and including the Indian. There is a curious phrase in the Constitution of the United States. It appears in Article I, section 2, and it …
"PEOPLE COMPELLED TO FILE INCOME TAXES VIOLATES THE 5TH AMENDMENT" Supreme Court ruled that income taxes constitute the compelled testimony of a witness: "The information revealed in the preparation and filing of an income tax return is, for the purposes of Fifth Amendment analysis, the testimony of a witness." "Government compels the filing of a return much as it compels,for example, the appearance of a ‘witness’ before a grand jury." Garner v. United States, 424 U.S. 648 (1975). :. Established that wages and income are NOT equivalent as far as taxes on income are concerned. "Decided cases have made the distinction between wages and income and have refused to equate the two in withholding or similar controversies. Central Illinois Public Service Co. v. United States, 435 U.S. 21(1978); Peoples Life Ins. Co. v. United States, 179 Ct. Cl. 318, 332, 373 F.2d 924, 932 (1967); Humble Pipe Line Co. v. United States, 194 Ct. Cl. 944, 950, 442 F.2d 1353, 1356 (1971); Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. United States, 194 Ct. Cl. 920, 442 F.2d 1362 (1971); Stubbs, Overbeck & Associates v. United States, 445 F.2d 1142 (CA5 1971); Royster Co. v. United States, 479 F.2d, at 390; (4th Cir. 1973); Acacia Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. United States, 272 F. Supp. 188 (Md. 1967). Supreme Court ruled that: "Waivers of Constitutional Rights not only must be voluntary, they must be knowingly intelligent acts, done with sufficient awareness of the relevant circumstances and consequences.": Brady v. U.S., 397 U.S. 742 at 748 (1970) (a) not effectively connected with the conduct of a “trade or business” (public office per 26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(26)) in the United States (government),
(b) not earned from sources within the geographical federal 5 territory. See Newman-Green v. Alfonso Larrain, 490 U.S. 826 (1989) “United States” defined in 26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(9) and (a)(10),
(c) not subject to reporting per 26 U.S.C. §6041 because not connected to a statutory “trade or business” (public office)
(d) not subject to withholding because not statutory “income” per 26 U.S.C. §643(b) and earned by a “non-resident non-person non-taxpayer
TRADE vs COMMERCE
All commerce is subject to statutes. Trade is NOT. Certain persons and activities are in commerce.
Contracts between people are TRADE and are NOT subject to State regulation like commerce is. And contracts between people are under EQUITY jurisdiction, while commerce is subject to STATUTORY jurisdiction.
And the reason why today’s TRADE is no longer under Equity jurisdiction, is because there is NO REAL (gold) MONEY in circulation, so it’s no longer TRADE, but COMMERCE. And commerce is rightfully regulated by the State.
So when you’re buying something with green paper FRNs, you’re NOT paying for it, but merely passing CREDIT that you got from the Central bank. You got paid with CREDIT from Central bank, and since you didn’t demand 12USC411 redemption in lawful money, you’re a DEBTOR in a ‘game’ of commerce, and so everything you own is subject to State regulation.
http://new.oregontrackers.com/
1. The IRS is not a U.S. Government Agency. It is an Agency of the IMF.
2. The IMF is an Agency of the UN.
3. The U.S. has not had a Treasury since 1921.
4. The U.S. Treasury is now the IMF.
5. The Attorney General of the U.S. is not employed by the U.S. but is an Agent of INTERPOL which is head quartered in Lyons, France.
6. The United States does not have any employees.
7. Social Security Numbers are issued by the UN through the IMF.
8. There are no Judicial courts in America and there has not been since 1789. Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statutes and Codes.
9. There have not been any Judges in America since 1789. There have just been Administrators.
10. According to the GATT you must have a Social Security Number.
11. You are an "Institutional Unit" in which your body and labor are pledged to the UN through the IMF.
12. We have One World Government, One World Law and a One World Monetary System.
13. Your Social Security Number is your slave number. Just about everyone in the World has a Social Security number from the UN through the IMF.
14. The UN is a One World Super Government.
15. No one on this planet has ever been free. This planet is a Slave Colony. There has always been a One World Government. It is just that now it is much better organized and has changed its name as of 1945 to the United Nations.
16. New York City is defined in the Federal Regulations as the United Nations. Rudolph Gulliani stated on C-Span that "New York City was the capital of the World" and he was correct.
17. Social Security is not insurance or a contract, nor is there a Trust Fund.
18. Your Social Security check comes directly from the IMF which is an Agency of the UN.
19. You own no property, slaves can’t own property. Read the Deed to the property that you think is yours. You are listed as a Tenant.
20. The most powerful court in America is not the United States Supreme Court but, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
GUESS WHO AND WHAT OWNS YOU AND THE UNITED NATIONS ?
As a matter of fact the imagined President, imagined Representatives, imagined Senators, imagined Supreme Court Justices and imagined Federal Judges are not paid by the United States Government. Actually the United States Government does not have any employees They are paid by the International Monetary Fund in electrons. You see there is no such thing as the United States Government. In reality there are no Governments. There are Corporations (Fictions) such as the Federal Reserve Inc., and the United States Inc., which in fact are private corporations. The United States Inc., is just a slave management company. Guess what that makes you? If you said property, you are correct! You are Human Capital. The shares that were issued for the Federal Reserve when it was created back in 1913 only cost $100.00. That was quite the bargain.
To verify the facts in the preceding paragraphs see (5 U.S.C. 903, 12 U.S.C. 95, 18 U.S.C.A. 914, 22 U.S.C. 263, 285, 286, 287, 288. Public Law 89-719, Public Law 94-564, Public Law 101-167, Public Law 91-151 Public Law 103-465, House Report 103-826 T.D.O 150-10, T.D.O. 92, 41 Stat. Chap 214 pg. 654, Emergency Banking Act 48 Stat. 1, Articles of Agreement 60 Stat. 1440, 20 CFR chapter 111, subpart B 422.103 (b) (2) (2), United Nations Secretariat Revised System of National Accounting, Diversified Metal Products v. IRS et al. CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.D.I., Cromelin v. United States, 177 F.2d 275, 277 Tomalewski v. United States, 493 F.Supp 673, 675 Foster v. Bork, 425 F.Supp 1318, 1319-20 FRC v. GE 281 U.S. 464, Keller v. PE 261 U.S. 428, United States v. LePatourel, 571 F2d 405, 410, Respublica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43, INTERPOL Constitution Art. 30, Executive Order 10422, Papal Bulls of 1455 and 1493. 42 Pa.C.S.A. 502. General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs.
When you see the documents for yourself, your mind will shatter into a thousand pieces. You will have to acknowledge that your entire life has been nothing but a hallucination. You will have to acknowledge that there is NOT, NOR HAS THERE EVER BEEN A GOVERNMENT, COUNTRIES, MONEY, OR CONSTITUTIONS. All GOVERNMENTS AND COUNTRIES ARE FABRICATED FICTIONS CLEVERLY WOVEN INTO YOUR MIND. They are fictions accepted by you because you have been lied to and poisoned your entire life.. What would you do without an external authority commanding you what to do and what not to do? Would you be lost? Did you ever think that maybe you would find yourself? I am not afraid to acknowledge that I am an incomplete ‘Being in motion’ searching for my reason for existing in this Petry dish commonly called Earth. The evidence in my possession cannot be rebutted. Think twice before labeling me.
One can quickly become diagnosed mentally ill for stating the facts listed above. Most American’s want people who research and discover things such as those listed above to be locked away or murdered because, it holds a mirror up to them and shows the evil that actually lurks in their hearts. That is exactly what has happened to me. Don’t you want my death? The people here in Pennsylvania love death. They also want Mumia Jamal, Lisa Lambert and a host of other innocent people murdered. When federal Judge Danzell released Lisa Lambert on a Habeas Corpus the people here in Central Pennsylvania wanted Judge Danzell impeached. They want Lisa Lambert dead. Judge Danzell said that Lisa Lambert’s case was the worst case that he has ever seen in the English speaking world. Like Jim Morrison said in the film "The Doors", "Hatred is a very under estimated emotion."
I will be dead soon enough. I am living in a "madhouse" now. I have been living here for a couple of months. I am on a steady diet of Lithium Haldol etc., which sooner or later kills you. It’s not that I really want to live in this world but, the death caused by the mixture of Lithium and Haldol is a terrible form of torture. I don’t like it here. I don’t have anyone to talk to. I don’t even have my own room. I feel so sorry for the people that live here. In my opinion not one of them is mentally ill. They all seem to be suffering from living through terrible childhood’s and never having anyone in their lives who cared about or loved them. I am glad that they did allow me to bring my computer with me. So I just sit here on the floor and type away. This essay will probably never be read by anyone. It is more of a diary than an essay. I am writing it for myself and my children. I write everyday and save it on disk so that when my children grow up, they can read for themselves why their dad was locked away in a home for the Insane. I never thought that they would go this far and do this to me and rob my children of their father. But, I do the unspeakable — I commit thought crimes.
18 U.S. Code § 3771 – Crime victims’ rights | US Law | LII /…
www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/3771
In a Federal habeas corpus proceeding arising out of a State conviction, the court … the victim’s right to restitution as provided in title 18, United States Code.
The Crime Victims’ Rights Act of 2004 and the Federal Courts …
www.uscourts.gov/…/crime-victims-rights-act-2004-and-federa…
Jun 2, 2008 … these rights in newly enacted 18 U.S.C. § 3771, which also placed on the … that “[ i]n a Federal habeas corpus proceeding arising out of a State …
18 U.S.C. 3771, Crime Victims’ Rights – Government Publishing…
www.gpo.gov/…/USCODE-2011-title18-partII-chap237-sec3771.pdf
Page 782. TITLE 18—CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. § 3771. CHAPTER … of a crime victim in Federal habeas corpus proceedings arising out of a …
Crime Victims’ Rights Act | USAO | Department of Justice
www.justice.gov/…/crime-victims-rights-o…/victims-rights-act
Jul 22, 2016 … 18 U.S.C. § 3771. Crime victims’ rights. (a) RIGHTS OF CRIME VICTIMS.–A crime victim has the following rights: (1) The right to be reasonably …
Crime Victims’ Rights Act: A Sketch of 18 USC §3771 – Federation…
fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RS22518.pdf
Dec 9, 2015 … Section 3771 of Title 18 of the United States Code is a statutory bill of ….. federal habeas corpus proceedings owe the victims of state crimes.
Gerald Buess – This is the Tax Fraud being pulled on We… |…
www.facebook.com/…/this-is-the-tax-fraud-…/1441181562572756/
Crime Victim, Corpus Delicti (~18 U.S.C. § 3771) Office of the Grantor/Settler
More education http://new.oregontrackers.com/
Ed Johnston info packet – Oregon Legislative Information System
https://olis.leg.state.or.us/liz/2015R1/Downloads/CommitteeMeetingDocument/71246
Mar 5, 2015 – within Lincoln county territory, do elect Edward- Malone: Johnston ll as the De …… 216 record at Oregon Senate hearing all taxes are voluntary …
Edward Johnston – Oregon Secretary Of State
https://secure.sos.state.or.us/orestar/cfDetail.do?page=search&cfRsn=9594
Candidate Name: Edward Malone Johnston, Date Filed: 03/08/2010 12:00:00 AM. Ballot Name: Edward … Have attended over 250 senate and house hearings.
Edward Johnston – edward- malone; johnston II Lawful… | Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/fox12oregon/…/edward…johnston…-/834077689988091/
edward- malone; johnston II Lawful Write-In Campaign, one has to have the … as Lincoln County … http://www.oregontrackers.com/SENATE__BILL__218.html.
Edward Johnston – Every Monday Read the information below …
https://www.facebook.com/denvernorml/posts/…educate…/1314779965251192/
Edward Johnston to Denver NORML … 5pm oregon ,6, Mountain 7pm,central 8pm eastcoast Call in 1866-802-2763 or 702 775 7035 …. [Journal of the Senate].
Edward Johnston – Please Read Edward’s And David’s… | Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/OregonDOT/posts/…edwards…/1092909610771563/
Edward Johnston shared a Page to Oregon Department of Transportation’s … Senators: Sherrod Brown 455 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510- …
The Unauthorized Practice of Law Fire your BAR Attorney. Refuse to acknowledge their corrupt inner-bar courts of thievery. Formally charge them with the illegal act of practicing law without lawful authority. Why? A BAR Attorney is not a lawyer by lawful definition. An Esquire is an officer of the State with the duty to carry out State activities, including "attornment." State officers have no constitutional authority to practice law as lawyers, barristers, advocates, or solicitors. Americans should begin formally charging these false lawyers with unlawfully practicing the profession of law since their BAR licenses only give them the privilege to be Attorneys and Squires over land transfers. The Unauthorized Practice of Law Fire your BAR Attorney. Refuse to acknowledge their corrupt inner-bar courts of thievery. Formally charge them with the illegal act of practicing law without lawful authority. Why? A BAR Attorney is not a lawyer by lawful definition. An Esquire is an officer of the State with the duty to carry out State activities, including "attornment." State officers have no constitutional authority to practice law as lawyers
A "public official” has no rights in relation to their employer, the city , state or federal government:
“The restrictions that the Constitution places upon the government in its capacity as lawmaker, i.e., as the regulator of private conduct, are not the same as the restrictions that it places upon the government in its capacity as employer. We have recognized this in many contexts, with respect to many different constitutional guarantees. Private citizens perhaps cannot be prevented from wearing long hair, but policemen can. Kelley v. Johnson, 425 U.S. 238, 247 (1976). Private Citizens cannot have their property searched without probable cause, but in many circumstances government employees can. O’Connor v. Ortega, 480 U.S. 709, 723 (1987) (plurality opinion); id., at 732 (SCALIA, J., concurring in judgment). Private citizens cannot be punished for refusing to provide the government information that may incriminate them, but government employees can be dismissed when the incriminating information that they refuse to provide relates to the performance of their job. Gardner v. Broderick, [497 U.S. 62, 95] 392 U.S. 273, 277 -278 (1968). With regard to freedom of speech in particular: Private Citizens cannot be punished for speech of merely private concern, but government employees can be fired for that reason. Connick v. Myers, 461 U.S. 138, 147 (1983). Private Citizens cannot be punished for partisan political activity, but federal and state employees can be dismissed and otherwise punished for that reason. Public Workers v. Mitchell, 330 U.S. 75, 101 (1947); Civil Service Comm’n v. Letter Carriers, 413 U.S. 548, 556 (1973); Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 616 -617 (1973).” [Rutan v. Republican Party of Illinois, 497 U.S. 62 (1990)]
More Education Information on Lawful Bloodline Native American http://new.oregontrackers.com
Notice: All Rights Reserved. Permission to distribute for non-commercial purposes is hereby granted, in whole or part, provided attribution and a link to this article is included. Commercial distribution without the written permission of the author is prohibited. This Public email message, including any attachment(s) is limited to the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain Privileged and/or Confidential Information. Any and All Political, Private or Public Entities, Federal, State, or Local Corporate Government(s), Municipality(ies), International Organizations, Corporation(s), agent(s), investigator(s), or informant(s), et. al., and/or Third Party(ies) working in collusion by collecting and/or monitoring My email(s),and any other means of spying and collecting these Communications Without my Exclusive Permission are Barred from Any and All Unauthorized Review, Use, Disclosure or Distribution. With Explicit Reservation of All My Rights,Without Prejudice and Without Recourse to Me. Any omission does not constitute a waiver of any and/or ALL Intellectual Property Rights or Reserved Rights Notice. *The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this “Message,” including attachments. The originator intended this Message for the specified recipients only; it may contain the originator’s confidential and proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies unintended recipients that they have received this Message in error, and strictly proscribes their Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based actions. Recipients-in-error shall notify the originator immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message. Authorized lawful bloodline Americans aka lawful Americans carriers of this message shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon v. Arch. Anything stated in this email may be limited in the content and is not to be taken out of context.**Wireless Copyright Notice**. Federal and State laws govern copyrights to this Message. You must have the originator’s full written consent to alter, copy, or use this Message.Originator acknowledges others’ copyrighted content in this Message. Otherwise Without Prejudice and Without Recourse to Me. Any omission does not constitute a waiver of any and/or ALL Intellectual Property Rights or Reserved Rights U.C.C.1-308. 1-207 WITH RESERVATION OF ALL RIGHTS WITHOUT PREJUDICE UCC 1 -308 NOTICE TO AGENTS IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS. NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS IS NOTICE TO AGENTS also look at http://new.oregontrackers.com/home.html
good video !!! ROMAN J ISRAEL, ESQ v HIMSELF !!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rewoG…
Notice: All Rights Reserved. Permission to distribute for non-commercial purposes is hereby granted, in whole or part, provided attribution and a link to this article is included. Commercial distribution without the written permission of the author is prohibited. This Public email message, including any attachment(s) is limited to the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain Privileged and/or Confidential Information. Any and All Political, Private or Public Entities, Federal, State, or Local Corporate Government(s), Municipality(ies), International Organizations, Corporation(s), agent(s), investigator(s), or informant(s), et. al., and/or Third Party(ies) working in collusion by collecting and/or monitoring My email(s),and any other means of spying and collecting these Communications Without my Exclusive Permission are Barred from Any and All Unauthorized Review, Use, Disclosure or Distribution. With Explicit Reservation of All My Rights,Without Prejudice and Without Recourse to Me. Any omission does not constitute a waiver of any and/or ALL Intellectual Property Rightsor Reserved Rights Notice.Copy right lawful bloodline Americans , lawful Americans 2013*The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this “Message,” including attachments. The originator intended this Message for the specified recipients only; it may contain the originator’s confidential and proprietary information.. The originator hereby notifies unintended recipients that they have received this Message in error, and strictly proscribes their Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based actions. Recipients-in-error shall notify the originator immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message. Authorized carriers of this message shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon v. Arch. Anything stated in this email may be limited in the content and is not to be taken out of context.**Wireless Copyright Notice**. Federal and State laws govern copyrights to this Message. You must have the originator’s full written consent to alter, copy, or use this Message.Originator acknowledges others’ copyrighted content in this Message. Otherwise Without Prejudice and Without Recourse to Me. Any omission does not constitute a waiver of any and/or ALL Intellectual Property Rights or Reserved Rights U.C.C, 1-207.1-308. NOTICE TO AGENTS IS Any omission does not constitute a waiver of any and/or ALL Intellectual Property Rights or Reserved Rights U.C.C, 1-207.1-308. NOTICE TO AGENTS IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS. NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS IS NOTICE TO AGENTS Foreign and or Domesticn and or Domestic
